An investment committee in kanduras and suits reviews a value chart on a wall screen at dusk, with a development under construction and lit cranes beyond the windows.

Does this proposal stand up before we commit?

Investment Validation traces a proposal’s value to its drivers and assumptions and tests how it moves, so the committee sees returns and risks together before it commits.

Book a demonstration on this decision See the outputs

The questions it answers

Five questions, answered on one evidence base.

  1. 01What really drives the value of this proposal?
  2. 02Which assumptions are evidenced, and which are hopeful?
  3. 03How does value move if cost, phasing or absorption shift?
  4. 04Which risks remain open, and who owns them?
  5. 05What would the committee need to see to approve?

How Hakken works on it

From the first reading of the evidence to a recorded decision.

  1. 01UnderstandTrace the proposal’s value drivers back to their sources and assumptions.
  2. 02GenerateRun sensitivities on the variables that move value: program, phasing, cost and absorption.
  3. 03EvaluateSet returns against risks and open questions, so the committee sees both together.
  4. 04DecideGive the investment committee a recorded rationale it can challenge.
Follow the full decision journey on the Platform page

What you get

Outputs your board can read and challenge.

Value drivers · Mixed-use district

Project valueRevenueSales pacePrice per m²CostConstructionInfrastructureTimingPhasingApprovals

Value-driver tree

What the value depends on, traced back to each assumption and its source.

Change in value · Each input ±10%

  • Absorption-14 / +11%
  • Construction cost-12 / +9%
  • Sales price-10 / +10%
  • Phasing delay-7 / +5%
  • Finance rate-4 / +3%

A range of outcomes, never a guaranteed return.

Sensitivity analysis

How far value moves when each input shifts, largest first.

Register · 4 of 12 open

  • Utility capacity, phase 2Owner · Utility authority
  • Absorption above 400 a yearOwner · Sales lead
  • Ground conditions, plot COwner · Engineer
  • Access road fundingOwner · Master developer

Risks and open questions

Each open risk with its owner and status, next to the returns.

DEC—0071 · Committee rationale

Decision
Proceed with phase 1 only
Owner
Investment committee
Returns
A range, never guaranteed
Condition
Revisit before phase 2 on utility capacity

Committee rationale

The committee’s decision and its basis, recorded so it can be challenged later.

Who it is for

Used by the people who commit capital, and by the teams who prepare the case they review.

  • Investment committees
  • Asset owners
  • Capital partners
See who we serve
Next use case Development Strategy What should this land become?

Bring us the decision you need to make.

Book a demonstration on this decision